Criminal Law Undergraduate Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words

Criminal Law Undergraduate - Essay Example Sami wins the race. As Sami is on the winner’s platform to get his award, Leila, in fight that her house was obligatorily bought to clear a path for the Velodrome, where the cycling has occurred, tosses paint over the suit of the authority introducing the decorations. So as to decide the criminal obligation of Sami and Leila it will be important to consider any conceivable offense that may have been carried out under the Criminal Damage Act 1971. For culmination, thought ought to likewise be given to any type of ambush charge that either may confront following their activities. Thought should be given to the essential actus reus and mens rea of any potential offenses, just as any potential protections each gathering may raise to limit their activities. So as to decide potential charges it will be important to inspect the wording of the 1971 Act, to examine the necessary components of the offense. (1)A individual who without legitimate reason pulverizes or harms any property having a place with another meaning to demolish or harm any such property or being careless concerning whether any such property would be devastated or harmed will be blameworthy of an offense. While considering the criminal risk of Sami it is additionally important to think about the earnestness of his activities, as the slackening of the screw on the bike was probably going to cause Karl to have a mishap, which could have been deadly. The 1971 Act manages such a chance. Under s1(2) it states As indicated by the 1971 Act, an individual can be said to have the fundamental mens rea for the offense on the off chance that they either expected to harm the property of another, or were wild with regards to whether their activities may cause such harm. It is in this way not important to demonstrate that they had direct expectation, however only that they should have seen that their activities may cause harm. One of the components the court will consider while deciding if the activities of